About SH&E, Inc.
Products and Services
Expertise
News and ViewsContact Us
SiteMapHome


 

SH&E FEATURED PROJECT


Mexican Airport Privatization
THE CHALLENGE

The move to privatization by any country requires an understanding of an airport's value to a bidder. A government must know what to expect in the bidding process, and anticipate the value of the airport concession which it hopes to realize. The Mexican government has been working for more than two years on privatizing substantially all of the airports in its airport system and has faced a number of difficult challenges along way.

In Mexico, one of the primary problems has been a lack of information by the government to evaluate the financial performance of its airports, and thus to realize the "value" of its airports. Airport accounting practices in Mexico were designed for national budgetary purposes, and do not present a realistic financial picture of each airport in the system. Specific airport tariffs have no relationship to the actual costs of providing services, and there is a high level of cross subsidization between airports, further complicating the evaluation of airport performance and value.

Another concern of the Mexican government has been that of the economic regulation of private airport operators. If Mexican airports are to be privatized, how would the government be able to protect airport users (principally the airlines) from monopolistic tendencies of an airport operator. The government desired to understand the best practices of other countries throughout the world so that it could develop its own regulation appropriate to local conditions in Mexico.

SH&E'S ROLE AND SPECIFIC ASSIGNMENT
SH&E was charged with developing the theory behind economic regulation and developing pricing strategies to prepare the airport system for privatization. Our work was a World Bank funded pre-privatization exercise to prepare the way for airport privatization. SH&E provided the following services to the Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transportes (SCT) of the government of Mexico:

Benchmarking of airport tariffs - One of the first priorities in airport privatization is to determine if existing airport prices are "competitive" in the world market. The ability to increase airport tariffs represents unrealized value to a private operator. SH&E conducted a broad benchmarking study of more than 100 airports comparable to those operated in Mexico to benchmark current aeronautical tariffs. In addition, SH&E developed a comprehensive analysis of airport tariffs of the top five airports in Mexico and the top five US gateway airports used by Mexican airlines.

Financial simulation model - SH&E developed a financial model for each of the 56 airports in the Mexican aviation system on a desegregated basis. The model was used to evaluated the financial performance of individual airports, groupings of airports, and the impact of changing pricing strategies (see below). It was subsequently used by the investment bankers to develop groupings as part of the overall concession strategy. The model provided a functional allocation of costs and overhead, and estimates of infrastructure investment requirements, which were missing from the financial statements of the airports. This model was used as part of the valuation process for the airport system.

New aeronautical pricing structure - The current airport tariff structure in Mexico is developed outside of the airport system by the national treasury (hacienda). There is no functional link between tariffs and the costs incurred by airports to deliver these services. Using a financial simulation model, SH&E developed and recommended a new pricing structure which better reflects airport costs.

Options for economic regulation - SH&E evaluate the "best practices" of economic regulation used throughout the world. Seven systems were identified as representative of the leading approaches used by governments to regulate airport prices. SH&E used these approaches to develop a recommended approach for Mexican economic regulation. The approach was patterned after the Australian model of price cap regulation for the monopolistic portion of an airport.

Length of the Assignment August 1996 to March 1997

THE LESSON
THERE ARE FEW MODELS APPROPRIATE FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

One of the major lessons from the Mexican experience is the lack of precedence for airport privatization in the developing world. Despite the considerable number of countries actively considering airport privatization, only a few have actually consummated transactions, and substantially all of these have been in the developed world.

Developing countries have a number of factors which must be considered in the decision of regulatory approach. Will the government require active or passive economic oversight of a third party operators? What is the level of independence of the regulator? What is the level of historical information available to evaluate the performance of a third party operator? How does the government establish quality of service standards where there have been none in the past? What burden of expense can the aviation system support in funding economic regulation? What is the tradeoff between regulation and the value of investment which the government wishes to accept?

These are all questions which arose in the course of analysis of the economic regulatory policy in Mexico. However, these are also the same questions which will be asked as other developing countries grapple with airport privatization. The answers are to be found in understanding the practices of regulation used around the world, and to use this knowledge to design a local approach.